Starting with the PCMark 8’s Storage test, this synthetic benchmark replicates everyday disk access like photo editing and web browsing. ADATA XPG SX8200 PRO M.2 2280 PCIe Gen3x4 SSD TEST PCMARK8 Storage Test The application allows for firmware updates, secured drive erasures, force TRIM service, run diagnostics, and more.
#970 PRO RAID 0 DISKMARK DOWNLOAD#
The ADATA SSD Toolbox comes free from to download from their website should you need it. Going through the retail box, ADATA provides an optional matte black-and-red heat spreader to add more aesthetics but would not be necessary should your motherboard have its heatsink provided. This particular model easily fits in most desktop builds but might not be applicable for notebook laptops that support thinner single-sided drives. Once you flip it over, we are greeted with the double-sided M.2 2280 model. Going over to the design of the ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB drive, we see the Silicon Motion SM12262EN with IMFT 64-Layer TLC NAND Flash and NANYA DDR3 DRAM chip. The SX8200 Pro supports multiple NVMe low power states and has an active rating of 0.33W and a slumber rating of 0.14W. The SMI also improved power consumption with the new SM22626EN controller.
#970 PRO RAID 0 DISKMARK PC#
This is more than enough for the average gamer or PC enthusiast. The SX8200 Pro comes with a 5-year warranty along with an endurance rating that goes up to 640TBW (terabytes written) for the 1TB model. The controller also brings support for NVMe 1.3 with end-to-end data protection and a RAID Engine for data integrity. Packed with Micron’s 64L 3D TLC, the ADATA SX8200 Pro provides an SMI SM22626En controller giving better performance and more efficiency. The ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro is priced at ₱8640 at PCHub (as of this writing) and performance peaks up to 3.5/GBs Read and 3GB/s Write with Random 4K numbers reaching up to 390,000 IOPS. It is said to be a great alternative to Samsung’s 970 Evo thanks to its price to performance ratio. Thanks to its price to performance ratio, it one of the most recommended m.2 NVMe. Here are a couple charts that show just the Samsung 960 PRO 512GB drive versus the 970 PRO 512GB to show the generational improvements.The ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro has been present in the SSD market since 2018. The QD1-4 Random Write performance is amazing on the 970 PRO 512GB drive as it was nearly as fast as the Intel Optane drives at QD1-2 and was faster than all the drives in the chart at QD3.
The HP M.2 SSD EX920 1TB performance was close to that of the Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB model.īenchmark Results: When it came to 4K Random Write performance, the Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB drive pulled away from the HP SSD EX920 M.2 1TB drive and never looked back. Solid performance uplifts here!īenchmark Results: When it comes to Random 4K performance at various queue depths we found the Samsung SSD 970 PRO is among the fastest drives that we have tested. This is about 12.3% higher than the socre that we got on the Samsung SSD 960 PRO 512GB drive. Anvil SSD Applications Benchmark at 46% Compression:īenchmark Results: With the compression at 46% to help mimic real world applications better the overall score dropped just slightly to 15,987.74 points. The ‘old’ Samsung SSD 960 PRO on the same test system scored 14,561 points, so we are seeing about a 10.6 percent uplift in the overall score on this popular benchmark utility. Random 4K QD16 performance reached 178,000 IOPS read and 362,000 IOPS write. The drive topped out at 3,121.95 MB/s read and 2,183.37 MB/s write speeds on the sequential performance test with 4MB file sizes. Anvil SSD Benchmark with 100% Compression (incompressible data):īenchmark Results: The Anvil SSD Benchmark showed that with 100% compression (incompressible data) the Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB drive had an overall score of 16,105.98 points. Still, it is another performance indicator with relevance and while some drives post good MB/s numbers, their IOPS scores aren’t always commensurate which this test will prove out. IOPS performance is something SSD makers tout quite a bit but we generally don’t do a lot of IOPS testing because frankly a lot of users can’t relate to IOPS metrics as well and it tends to be more meaningful to the enterprise/server crowd. Since some of the tests more or less duplicate what we get from other benchmarks we use already, we decided to use the IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) testing on 4kb file sizes at a queue depth of 1, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 and 128. It’s a very powerful tool that measures performance through a variety of tests which can be customized. There’s a relatively new benchmark called Anvil Storage Utilities that is in beta but close to production.
Anvil Storage Utilities Anvil Storage Utilities 1.1.0Īlong with the move to a new platform, we decided to make a change in one of the benchmarks.
0 kommentar(er)
